CIPP: Implementation of the Educational Evaluation Model

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Septian Aristya
Zurqoni
Sugeng

Abstract

The application of evaluation in education has many benefits, this is evident by the benefits provided both to teachers, policy users, parents and also the community, as a process of evaluating and measuring effectiveness in the implementation of education that has been implemented. One of the evaluation models commonly applied in education is the CIPP (Context-Input-Process-Product) model developed by Stufflebeam. It is hoped that this research can examine more deeply the implementation of the evaluation of the CIPP model in education. This study used a pure library research method with an analytical descriptive approach. The implementation of the CIPP model in education includes 4 stages or evaluation objects, First, Context Evaluation which includes the concept of goals, objectives and implementation planning; Second, Input Evaluation, which includes a thorough evaluation regarding the availability of resources and potential in program implementation; Third, Process Evaluation, which includes compliance with planning, maximizing resources, process constraints and others; Fourth, Product Evaluation, which includes the results of program implementation by reviewing reports and assessments of each related element and providing recommendations on program implementation.


 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Septian Aristya, Zurqoni, & Sugeng. (2023). CIPP: Implementation of the Educational Evaluation Model. Jurnal Evaluasi Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.52647/jep.v5i1.84

References

  1. Ambiyar and Muharika (2019) Metodelogi Penelitian Evaluasi Program. Bandung: Penerbit ALFABETA Bandung.
  2. Arikunto, S. and Cepi Saruddin Abdul Jabar (2018) Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Islam (Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32699/paramurobi.v2i1.817.
  3. Arofah, E.F. (2021) ‘Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan “jurnal tawadhu’’ Vol.5 no.2,2021”’, jurnal tawadhu, Vol.5 no.2 , 2021, 5(2), pp. 1–23.
  4. Astuti, M.H.B.E.R.P. (2018) ‘Evaluasi CIPP (Context Input Process Product) Penerapan Kurikulum SMK’, Prodi Teknologi Pendiidkan FIP IKIP Mataram, 1, pp. 23–39.
  5. Azra, A. (1999) Pendidikan Islam; Tradisi dan Modernisasi Menuju Milennium Baru. Jakarta: PT Logis.
  6. Darodjat dan Wahyudhiana M (2015) ‘Model Evaluasi , Measurement, Assessment, Evaluation’, Islamadina, XIV, pp. 1–28.
  7. Kurniawati, E.W. (2021) ‘Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Perspektif Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product)’, Jurnal GHAITSA Islamic Education Jurnal, Volume 2(1), p. 24.
  8. Mahmudi, I. (2011) ‘CIPP?: Suatu Model Evaluasi Pendidikan. At-Ta’Dib’, Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6(1), pp. 111–125.
  9. Muttaqin, M.E. (2020) ‘Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam’, Prosiding Nasional, 3, pp. 171–180.
  10. Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata (2006) Pengembangan Kurikulum?: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  11. Nurcholis, A., Pendidikan, M.F.-I. al-A.J. and 2019, undefined (no date) ‘Evaluasi Kurikulum Bahasa Arab Di MAN 1 Trenggalek’, jurnal.uinsu.ac.id [Preprint]. Available at: http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/ihya/article/view/4420 (Accessed: 17 February 2023).
  12. Riinawati (2021) Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Thema Publishing.
  13. Rusman (2012) Manajemen Kurikulum,. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  14. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2003) ‘The CIPP Model for Evaluation’, International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, pp. 31–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4.
  15. Suharsimi Arikunto (2010) Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  16. Teguh Triwiyanto (2015) Manajemen Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  17. Wahyudhiana and Darodjat (2015) ‘Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan’, Islamadina, 1(1), pp. 1–28.
  18. Zainuri, A., Aquami and AnNur, S. (2021) EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN (kajian teoritik). Pasuruan: CV. penerbit Qiara Media.